Great news that Kansas voters turned out in force to give Mike Huckabee a 60% margin.
The win in Louisiana is good news, but with less than a 50% margin, the LA convention will make the final determination. Hopefully they will follow the primary.
John McCain is projected to win Washington with a margin of just a little over 200 votes. Not all precincts have reported, so the outcome could be questionable. What is surprising is a strong showing for Ron Paul and the 16% who voted for Mitt Romney even though he suspended his campaign on Thursday. Do WA Romney operatives know something the rest of us don't know? Is Mitt hoping to be the spoiler at the convention? Or are WA Republicans just living up to an independent streak?
Showing posts with label caucus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label caucus. Show all posts
Sunday, February 10, 2008
Friday, February 1, 2008
Minnesota Matters
Well look at that ... we made the Google front page. Of course, due to Google's rotation policy the article may be gone before you go to look. Still, its unusual for the frozen chosen to get a spot on national news. Here are a few of the stories for your reading pleasure:
FACTBOX: Minnesota and its presidential caucus
Super Tuesday: Why Minnesota caucuses matter
FACTBOX: Minnesota and its presidential caucus
Super Tuesday: Why Minnesota caucuses matter
Thursday, January 3, 2008
Nail biting time ...
Then it will be nail biting time for the next few hours.
Meanwhile, over at CNN
Jack Cafferty asks: "Are Iowa and New Hampshire the right places to start the presidential election process?"
And I answer: You bet they are Jack!
Rather than the crush of states pushing to move up their primaries and caucuses, we, the people, would be much better served if they were more spread out and we were able to meet the candidates the way the people of Iowa and New Hampshire have done. We, the people, could then make much more informed decisions.
Cafferty's comments indicate that many think the conventions are a waste of time and that we should just have a national primary. I strongly disagree. Such a scenario favors the candidates with deep pockets and would most likely give us a President who had little to nothing in common with the population. I'd rather go into the convention with several viable candidates than to have it all settled by March.
And I answer: You bet they are Jack!
Rather than the crush of states pushing to move up their primaries and caucuses, we, the people, would be much better served if they were more spread out and we were able to meet the candidates the way the people of Iowa and New Hampshire have done. We, the people, could then make much more informed decisions.
Cafferty's comments indicate that many think the conventions are a waste of time and that we should just have a national primary. I strongly disagree. Such a scenario favors the candidates with deep pockets and would most likely give us a President who had little to nothing in common with the population. I'd rather go into the convention with several viable candidates than to have it all settled by March.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)